<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Horsehead Nebula Region Wide Field	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/</link>
	<description>Astrodoc.ca - Images of the Universe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 20:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Brecher		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/#comment-17886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Brecher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 20:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=11424#comment-17886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t use Drizzle integration for this image. Sorry :-(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t use Drizzle integration for this image. Sorry 🙁</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod Hutson		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/#comment-17882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Hutson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 06:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=11424#comment-17882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really like this image, which includes all the features of the region in a single frame for a better sense of context, rather than each featured object in a separate frame as if floating in isolation.

Everybody has seen a closeup image of the HH Neb in a magazine or a marketing brochure or somewhere, and instantly knows (roughly) what its called. Yet almost nobody, except AP&#039;s, even knows where it is in the sky or how small a part of the whole region it really is. To that end, your capture is educational on many levels.

I&#039;m a couple years late coming to the party, but still, I GOTTA ask if I can see the drizzled version. Thanks !!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this image, which includes all the features of the region in a single frame for a better sense of context, rather than each featured object in a separate frame as if floating in isolation.</p>
<p>Everybody has seen a closeup image of the HH Neb in a magazine or a marketing brochure or somewhere, and instantly knows (roughly) what its called. Yet almost nobody, except AP&#8217;s, even knows where it is in the sky or how small a part of the whole region it really is. To that end, your capture is educational on many levels.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a couple years late coming to the party, but still, I GOTTA ask if I can see the drizzled version. Thanks !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/#comment-14293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 03:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=11424#comment-14293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent image, amazing job on the processing, I always have issues with the bright stars, your control over them is note worthy. The detail in Barnard 33 is very nice as well you have captured a lot of the wispy tendrils that some times get processed out. 
NGC 434 is an amazing object and always gets oohs and ahhs when I show mine at outreach events. This one is inspiring for me, want to reprocess my data using PI and see what I can come up with.

I would like to see the  full resolution Drizzled version please.
Thank You]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent image, amazing job on the processing, I always have issues with the bright stars, your control over them is note worthy. The detail in Barnard 33 is very nice as well you have captured a lot of the wispy tendrils that some times get processed out.<br />
NGC 434 is an amazing object and always gets oohs and ahhs when I show mine at outreach events. This one is inspiring for me, want to reprocess my data using PI and see what I can come up with.</p>
<p>I would like to see the  full resolution Drizzled version please.<br />
Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Brecher		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/#comment-14273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Brecher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 17:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=11424#comment-14273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/#comment-14239&quot;&gt;Tim&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Tim! Happy New Year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/#comment-14239">Tim</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Tim! Happy New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/horsehead-wide/#comment-14239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 23:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=11424#comment-14239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Beautiful image as always, really enjoy the Tek breakdown too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful image as always, really enjoy the Tek breakdown too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
