<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: M101, The Pinwheel Galaxy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://astrodoc.ca/m101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/</link>
	<description>Astrodoc.ca - Images of the Universe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Louis		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-25572</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=6414#comment-25572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ron, excellent image. Thanks for sharing the process flow you used.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, excellent image. Thanks for sharing the process flow you used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Astrodoc		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-230</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astrodoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=6414#comment-230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-229&quot;&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt;.

I haven&#039;t tried exactly 10 hours, but I did compare the 41.33 and 27.33 hr versions.  The difference in luminance is what drives the difference in result — 29 hr vs 15 hr.  This really made a huge difference.  However, when I considered whether to go for another 10 hours, I figured I’d only get about a 15% improvement in S/N, so I decided to press on for other objects.  There are so many objects and so little time  :-)

I aim for an image scale around 1 arcsec/pixel, so f/6.8 works great for me with my camera, which has 9 micron pixels.  Your image scale of 1.3”/pixel is very good.  If you think it is under sampled for your seeing, consider using PixInsight’s new Drizzle combination process to improve resolution (and your image scale).  You could also shoot unbind, which would give you around 0.65&quot;/px - excellent if you often have good seeing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-229">Mark</a>.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried exactly 10 hours, but I did compare the 41.33 and 27.33 hr versions.  The difference in luminance is what drives the difference in result — 29 hr vs 15 hr.  This really made a huge difference.  However, when I considered whether to go for another 10 hours, I figured I’d only get about a 15% improvement in S/N, so I decided to press on for other objects.  There are so many objects and so little time  🙂</p>
<p>I aim for an image scale around 1 arcsec/pixel, so f/6.8 works great for me with my camera, which has 9 micron pixels.  Your image scale of 1.3”/pixel is very good.  If you think it is under sampled for your seeing, consider using PixInsight’s new Drizzle combination process to improve resolution (and your image scale).  You could also shoot unbind, which would give you around 0.65&#8243;/px &#8211; excellent if you often have good seeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-229</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=6414#comment-229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ron,

Saw this great image on the ASA forum.

It would perhaps be instructive to process, say, 10 hours worth, and see what the difference is. I am currently also using ASA10N with all the focal ratio options, but the farthest I&#039;ve gone at f/6.8 is 5 hours 20 min with X2 binning for a scale of 1.3&quot;/px.

Regards,
Mark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ron,</p>
<p>Saw this great image on the ASA forum.</p>
<p>It would perhaps be instructive to process, say, 10 hours worth, and see what the difference is. I am currently also using ASA10N with all the focal ratio options, but the farthest I&#8217;ve gone at f/6.8 is 5 hours 20 min with X2 binning for a scale of 1.3&#8243;/px.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michael		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=6414#comment-223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What an amazing shot Ron!
When I first started observing with an SC-8 this galaxy was my nemesis. I had no idea what to look for...just that the guide books said it had high luminosity. Night after night I searched the appropriate sky, often using high magnification. You know what I was doing...looking right through it. ...Looking at the leaves and missing the forest!
Colours and details are wonderful. Keep up the great work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an amazing shot Ron!<br />
When I first started observing with an SC-8 this galaxy was my nemesis. I had no idea what to look for&#8230;just that the guide books said it had high luminosity. Night after night I searched the appropriate sky, often using high magnification. You know what I was doing&#8230;looking right through it. &#8230;Looking at the leaves and missing the forest!<br />
Colours and details are wonderful. Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Astrodoc		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astrodoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=6414#comment-140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-139&quot;&gt;Roy T. Conrad&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks!  Yes, my images are for sale.  I need to finish it first though! ;-).  I will let you know when it is ready. 

Clear skies!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-139">Roy T. Conrad</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks!  Yes, my images are for sale.  I need to finish it first though! ;-).  I will let you know when it is ready. </p>
<p>Clear skies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roy T. Conrad		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-139</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy T. Conrad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 00:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=6414#comment-139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ron, that is one of the most beautiful picture that we have ever seen. FANTASTIC. If you make prints I would like to purchase one. 

PS. 
I have showed it to a few people and they loved it.

Roy and Paula.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, that is one of the most beautiful picture that we have ever seen. FANTASTIC. If you make prints I would like to purchase one. </p>
<p>PS.<br />
I have showed it to a few people and they loved it.</p>
<p>Roy and Paula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken		</title>
		<link>https://astrodoc.ca/m101/#comment-86</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astrodoc.ca/?p=6414#comment-86</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very nice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
