Propeller Nebula Region

Propeller Nebula RegionClick image for full size version

August 7, 2017

There is so much going on in this image it is hard to know where to start. The image is dominated by hydrogen-rich emission nebula lying just west of the line connecting Deneb and gamma-Cygni (γ-Cyg), and some of the objects within it are identified in an annotated image that I prepared. The Propeller Nebula (DWB 111) is at upper right. The pretty blue patches are reflection nebula; from top to bottom they are NGC 6914, vdB 132 and vdB 131. There are also many bright and dark nebula that belong to the LBN and LDN catalogues, respectively, though they are not labelled in the annotated image. To round out the field, dark nebula Barnard 346 is near top left, and open cluster Cr 421 is just left of centre at the bottom of the image.

All of these objects lie around 6,000 light years away, considerably farther than the 1,600 light years distance to the nearby (in the sky) North America Nebula near Deneb, and IC 1318, which surrounds γ-Cyg. 

Propeller Nebula RegionThis field is located in a very rich part of the Milky Way, which is why there are so many stars in the image. I prepared a black and white version that uses only H-alpha (deep red) data, and shows more subtle brightness differences and smaller stars. Click on the thumbnail to see it full size.

Tekkies:
Moravian G3-16200 EC camera (on loan from O’Telescope), Optolong Ha, R, G and B filters, Takahashi FSQ-106 ED IV at f/3.6, Paramount MX, unguided. Acquisition with the SkyX, focused with FocusMax, scripted with CCD Commander. All pre-processing and processing in PixInsight. Acquired from my SkyShed in Guelph. Moderate moonlight for Ha, no moonlight for RGB, average transparency and seeing.

18x5m R, G and B and 48x10m Ha unbinned frames (total=12hr30m). 

NB-RGB Creation:
Creation and cleanup:  The BatchPreProcessing script was used to perform calibration, cosmetic correction and registration of all frames. DrizzleIntegration was used to make the channel masters. The R, G, B and Ha masters were cropped to remove edge artifacts. R, G and B were combined to make an RGB image which was processed with DBE, BackgroundNeutralization and ColorCalibration.

Combining Ha and RGB data: The NBRGBCombination script was run with default settings using Ha for red narrowband . BackgroundNeutralization and ColorCalibration were applied. 

Linear Noise Reduction:  MultiscaleLinearTransform was used to reduce noise in the NB-RGB image. Layer settings for threshold and strength: Layer 1: 3.0 0.8   Layer 2: 2.5, 0.7  Layer 3: 2., 0.6  Layer 4: 1.0, 0.2  Layer 5: 0.5, 0.1.

Stretching:  HistogramTransformation was applied to the NB-RGB image to make a pleasing, bright image.

Synthetic Luminance:
Creation and cleanup of SynthL: Prior to noise reduction of the NB-RGB image, RGBWorkingSpace was used to equalize all the channels and the luminance was extracted for separate processing.

Deconvolution:  A star mask was made to use as a local deringing support image. A copy of the image was stretched to use as a range mask. Deconvolution was applied (50 iterations, regularized Richardson-Lucy, external PSF made using DynamicPSF tool with about 30 stars).

Linear Noise Reduction:  MultiscaleLinearTransform was used to reduce noise in the background areas of the NB-RGB file. Layer settings for threshold and strength: Layer 1: 3.0 0.8   Layer 2: 2.5, 0.6  Layer 3: 2., 0.5  Layer 4: 1.0, 0.2.

Stretching:  HistogramTransformation was applied to the SynthL to make a pleasing, bright image. 

Noise Reduction and Re-Stretch: TGVDenoise was applied in Lab mode with 300 iterations with a range mask applied to protect high signal areas.  This was followed by a HistogramTransformation to raise the black point (but with no clipping). 

Combining SynthL with NB-RGB:
The processed SynthL was applied to the NB-RGB image using LRGBCombine.

Additional Processing:
Contrast Enhancement: The contrast was boosted with two passes of LocalHistogramEqualization with max contrast of 1.5 (scale 50, strength 0.45 and scale 150, strength 0.18) using a mask to protect background and stars. The mask was made by making a very blurred range mask with the RangeSelection tool and a star mask with the StarMask tool, and then using PixelMath to subtract the star mask from the range mask without rescaling.

Final Steps: MultiscaleLinearTransform was used to sharpen the structures in the bright parts of the nebulae (layers 2-4 at 0.05). Background, nebula and star brightness, contrast and saturation were adjusted in several iterations using Curves with masks as required. Stars were reduced in size using the Morphological Selection mode of the MorphologicalTransformation tool and blending the result with a copy of the image processed with the StarReduction script. The DarkStructureEnhance script was used to increase contrast between dark nebula and brighter regions.

Image scale is about 1.6 arcsec per pixel for this camera/telescope combination and Drizzle processing.

 

Share on Facebook6Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0
By | 2017-08-08T16:45:07+00:00 August 7th, 2017|Nebulae, Wide Field|2 Comments

About the Author:

An avid astrophotographer who has been hunting deep sky treasures with his camera and telescope for many years now. He enjoys sharing the amazing cosmos with others.

2 Comments

  1. Steve D August 8, 2017 at 4:26 pm - Reply

    Ron: I see a second, much larger 4-blade propeller in this image that basically encompasses the whole frame.

Leave A Comment